During and after VYF was launched, people kept hearing me promising to publish this news paper. Why was it such an obssession for me to put out a "news paper"? Will I ever manage to materialize the "ambition"? Will people embrace it (the cause)? Do I have what it take? Will it (whatever that I could scramble to publish) do anybody any good, or ever become anything significant?
Let's see what all the fuss is about, through an article I wrote about Chai Vang, a hunter who was accused and convicted of killing six other hunters in Minesota last November. Of course this cannot explain or state all my reasons or motives which had driven me to want to publish Viet Herald. But I hope it will shed some light on my agenda.
******************************************************************
Chapter XII: Why Insisted "News Paper Will Be Published"?
Chai Vang, reportedly by
national vanguard.org as the son of general
Vang Pao, was convicted yesterday of all counts on the six murder charges he faced.
More details.
I am not here to justify or condone the killings--murder or otherwise. However, I've been following this story since it first broke. And if you read the news, you'd think he's a Hmong immrigrant who just obtained a visa to work in this country driving trucks, got lost and tresspassed into a patch of private land while deer hunting. During the dispute after being confronted by the land owner(s), he'd gone mad and coldbloodedly slaughtered six local hunters--shooting four in the back, one young man, one young woman--wounding two others.
There're always two sides of a coin, more than one versions of "the story". But it's not my intention to either defend or condemn the killer. I sincerely hope the jury--our fellow citizens in Hayward, Minesota--did they job, and justice has been served. Though not perfect, our judicial system, I believe, is still one of the best mankind ever had.
The thing that concerns me the most, from the begining--enough to convinced me to quit my "job" and reconsider the idea of publishing a "news paper" that could represent us more accurately or fairly and would cover issues which are more relevant to our needs and inetrests--was how the main stream media covered the case and how they portraited Chai Vang.
Like it or not, I happen to share a few traits similar to that of Chai Vang. We both are southeast asian. I'm Vietnamese; Vang is Hmong (Laotian). We both came to the U.S. in 1980 as refugees when we were teenagers. I came to California in April, 1980; Vang came to Minesota in June, 1980. I was a boat people, spent a year on an Indonesia island; Vang spent five years at a Thai refugee camp. We both reside in California for many years. I've been here since 1980; Vang moved here 1985 and back to Minesota in 2000. We are both naturalized american. I was sworn-in in 1985; Vang became naturalized in...
However, I never served in the army, or coast guard, or the reserve. But Vang has. He attended Military Cadet Academy when in high school, served six years in the California National Guard (1989-1995), has a marksman badge, earned some medal for good conduct. He's a veteran. He's younger than me. In a way, I think he is more americanized than I am.
In this time of needs (Iraq War, disaster reliefs), one would think being a veteran would mean something. If not being considered a "hero", a role model, at least the veterans, which Chai Vang is one, deserve our gratuity or appreciation for their service. Not to mention that his father is Vang Pao, a general in Lao, former ally with the U.S. military during the Vietnam War (if that info is true).
My point? I still speak with an accent; my appetise is still very ethnic; my taste of fashion, music or entertainment are still different than those younger than me (second generation immigrant). I am culturally inept, still an FOB after growing up and living here for more than 20 years. I couldn't help it.
If the media can present Chai Vang in such a light (a Hmong, immigrant, refugee... rarely ever a veteran, an american or truck driver) then I guess there's no way the mainstream pundits, major networks or media would consider me an "american" if I ever got into trouble with another "true american"--the red blooded white folks. And I thought I'm legally american.
To them I am still just another refugee from a war-torn backward water-hole somewhere in South East Asia, who was lucky enough to be allowed to migrate into this paradise on earth--the U.S. of A.
Think you can fair better?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++
http://vietyouth.net/Forums/viewtopic.php?t=938